One newspaper said the program began "without hiccups" and quoted supporters and opponents. Another local publication put out several catastrophizing articles.

The Details: On Sunday, New York City's government launched a long-delayed program to reduce traffic by charging fees on vehicles entering Manhattan below 60th Street. Smaller vehicles will pay $9 once per day if entering during the "peak period," or $2.25 if entering during the "overnight period," with higher fees for trucks and buses. For-hire vehicles will instead pay $1.50 per trip during both periods.

For Context: The congestion pricing scheme was approved by the New York state legislature in 2019, but political challenges, environmental reviews, and other obstacles stalled its implementation for years. Last year, Democratic Gov. Kathy Hochul controversially delayed the plan from a previous start date of June 30, 2024. The revenue from congestion fees will fund capital improvements to the city's transit system.

How the Media Covered It: The New York Times (Lean Left bias) and the New York Post (Lean Right bias) took starkly different approaches to covering the congestion pricing rollout. The Times characterized it as smooth and effective, noting no unforeseen problems arose on Sunday and pointing to data showing slightly faster travel speeds on major roads as proof the plan was already reducing traffic. It included a balance of perspectives, including enthused cyclists, disgruntled commuters, and ambivalent for-hire drivers. In contrast, the Post painted a picture of a "wildly unpopular congestion toll" with articles about "clever" fare evasion tactics, potential consequences for surrounding communities, and linking a subway stabbing to the plan, capping it all off with its editorial board panning the program.