A Georgia judge rejected an attempt by former President Donald Trump’s legal team to have his election interference case dismissed on free speech grounds.

For Context: In August 2023, Georgia prosecutors charged Trump and 18 others with engaging in a “criminal racketeering enterprise to overturn Georgia’s presidential election result.” Trump’s legal team argued the former president’s words challenging the results of the 2020 election were protected by the First Amendment.

Details: Fulton County Superior Court Judge Scott McAfee rejected this bid but left the door open for a similar challenge in the future “at the appropriate time after the establishment of a factual record.”

Key Quotes: McAfee stated, “After considering the extensive briefing, the argument of counsel, and the indictment, the Court finds these vital constitutional protections do not reach the actions and statements alleged by the State. Nor do the statutes themselves facially violate the First Amendment.” He added, “After interpreting the indictment’s language liberally in favor of the State as required at this pretrial stage, the Court finds that the Defendants’ expressions and speech are alleged to have been made in furtherance of criminal activity and constitute false statements knowingly and willfully made in matters within a government agency’s jurisdiction which threaten to deceive and harm the government.”

How the Media Covered It: The judge’s decision is being covered prominently across the spectrum. CNN (Lean Left bias) stated that “the free speech defense has repeatedly fallen short in pretrial wrangling in election meddling cases.”